A Nobel Laureate (Economics)
Writes on the Insanity of Our Food Policy
by Hemi Weingarten
Nobel prize winner Joseph Stiglitz is considered one of
the top 5 economists in the world today. He is currently a professor at
Columbia University in New York, and has a distinguished track record on both
international and national monetary and social issues.
American food policy has
long been rife with head-scratching illogic. We spend billions every year on
farm subsidies, many of which help wealthy commercial operations to plant more
crops than we need. The glut depresses world crop prices, harming farmers in
developing countries. Meanwhile, millions of Americans live tenuously close to
hunger, which is barely kept at bay by a food stamp program that gives most
beneficiaries just a little more than $4 a day. Read more…
Stiglitz introduces the
concept of “rent seeking” which is an economic term for what wealthy groups of
people do to get wealthier – seek political influence to change the rules of
the game to their favor. When it comes to food policy, we see it in the Farm
Bill every 5 years. Lobbies representing rich agricultural corporations buy our
politicians’ vote by supporting their reelection campaigns with cash. The
result is farm subsidies going mostly to rich corporate farmers for growing
monoculture crops such as corn and soy. On the other hand, as part of the Farm
Bill, Congress will be voting to reduce spending on SNAP programs, formerly
known as food stamps, which tens of millions of Americans rely on today to feed
their families. Why? Because poor people don’t have an influential lobby
representing them.
Another unfortunate side
effect of subsidies for mostly the richest farmers is an oversupply of corn and
soy. It has led to the production of cheap and unhealthy foods and beverages
over the last five decades. Think sodas with high fructose corn syrup, and
snack aisles filled with chips fried in cheap soy oil. This junk food has
created an obesity and disease crisis of historic proportions. Today it is
cheaper and easier for people to buy junk food compared to healthy food. The
default choice is cheap and unhealthy. This is especially impacting the folks
receiving SNAP.
How about a subsidy program
to encourage more healthy fruit and vegetable production? How about fresh
produce that is actually cheaper than a bag of chips and a can of cola?
No comments:
Post a Comment