by URI AVNERY
Kafr Kana, a village near Nazareth, is probably the
place where Jesus – according to the New Testament – turned water into wine.
Now it is the Arab village where the Israeli police is turning stones into
blood.
On the fateful day, the police was confronting a group
of young Arabs protesting against the Israeli efforts to change the status quo
on the Temple Mount (known to Muslims as “the Noble Sanctuary”). Such
demonstrations were taking place that day in many Arab towns and villages all
over Israel, and especially in occupied East Jerusalem.
According to the first police statement, the 22-year
old Arab, Kheir a-Din Hamdan, attacked the police with a knife. In self
defense, they had no choice but to shoot and kill him.
As so often with police reports, this was a pack of
lies.
Unfortunately (for the police), the incident was
recorded by security cameras. The pictures clearly showed Hamdan approaching a
police car and beating on its windows with something, possibly a knife. When he
saw that this had no effect, Hamdan turned around and started to walk away.
At that moment, the policemen got out of the car and
immediately started to shoot at the back of Hamdan, who was hit and fell to the
ground. The officers surrounded him and, after some hesitation, obviously a
consultation between them, started to drag the wounded youngster on the ground
towards the patrol car, as if he were a sack of potatoes. They dumped him on
the floor of the car and drove away (to a hospital, it appears), with their
feet on or near the dying man.
The pictures show clearly, for everyone to see, that
the policemen violated the standing police orders for opening fire: they were
in no immediate mortal danger, they did not shout a warning, they did not shoot
first in the air, they did not aim at the lower part of his body. They did not
call an ambulance. The youngster bled to death. It was a cold-blooded execution.
There was an outcry. Arab citizens rioted in many
places. Under pressure, the Police Investigation board (which belongs to the
Ministry of Justice) started an investigation. The first investigation already
uncovered several facts which put an even more severe face on the incident.
It appeared that before the cameras caught the scene,
the police had arrested Hamdan’s cousin and put him into the car. Obviously,
Kheir a-Din wanted to release the cousin and therefore beat on the car. The
cousin saw him being shot and dumped on the floor of the car in which he was
sitting.
The first reaction of the police command was to
justify the behavior of the policemen, whose names and faces were withheld.
They were spirited away to some other police unit.
I describe the incident at length, not because it is
unique but on the contrary – because it is so typical. What was special about
it was only the unnoticed presence of the camera.
Several cabinet ministers lauded the exemplary
behavior of the police in this incident. This can be dismissed as the
publicity-hunting of extreme right-wing demagogues, who believe that their
voters approve of all and any shooting of Arabs. They should know.
However, one statement cannot be ignored: the one made
by the Minister of Home Security.
A few days before the incident, Minister Yitzhak
Aharonowitz, a protégé of Avigdor Lieberman and himself a former police
officer, declared publicly that he did not want any terrorist to survive after
an attack.
That is a manifestly illegal statement. Indeed, it is
a call for crimes. Under the law, policemen are not allowed to shoot
“terrorists” or anybody else after they are taken prisoner, especially when
they are wounded and do not present any “mortal danger”.
Aharonowitz always seems a nice guy. He has a knack of
popping up before the cameras after every newsworthy incident – whether a
severe road accident, a political crime or a fire. God knows how he manages
that.
In actual fact, the Minister for Home Security
(formerly known as Minister of Police) has practically no function. Since the
days of the British Mandate, the commander of the police force has been the
Inspector General, a uniformed professional officer. The sole police function
of the minister is to recommend to the government the appointment of a new
commander.
But for ordinary policemen, a statement by the
minister sounds like an order. Quite probably, the irresponsible utterance of
the minister was a direct incitement to the crime of Kafr Kanna. Especially
since neither the Inspector General nor the Prime Minister denounced it.
All this reminds one of the fateful 1984 utterance of
then Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir, who also declared that no terrorist should
stay alive after an attack. The direct result was the “Bus Line 300″ affair, in
which four Arab boys, without any weapons, hijacked an Israeli bus. They were
stopped, two were shot during the recapture, and two were taken alive. One of
them was murdered by the chief of the Shin Bet himself, Avraham Shalom, who
crushed his skull with a rock. When the pictures were published (first by me),
Shalom and his colleagues were pardoned. Shamir denied any responsibility.
Back to today’s events. Is this the long-awaited Third
Intifada? Yes? No?
Army and police officers, politicians and especially
media commentators are busy trying to answer this question. (Intifada means
literally “shaking off”.)
This is not just a mere semantic game. The definition
carries with it operational consequences.
As a matter of fact, the entire country is now aflame.
East Jerusalem is already a war zone, with daily demonstrations, riots and
bloodshed. In Israel proper, since the Kafr Kanna killing Arab citizens are
also mounting daily strikes and demonstrations. In the West Bank, there were
some demonstrations and a fatal stabbing, after which an Arab was shot and
killed.
Mahmoud Abbas is doing everything in his power to
prevent a general uprising, which might quite well endanger his regime. But
pressure from below is mounting. Abbas refused to meet Netanyahu in Amman.
Popular wisdom in Israel has already found a name for
the situation: “Intifada of Individuals”. For the Israeli security chiefs, that
is a nightmare. They are ready for an organized Intifada. They know how to
quash it by force, and, if necessary, by more force. But what to do with an
Intifada which is entirely made by isolated individuals, with no orders from
any organization, with no grouping that can be infiltrated by the collaborators
of the Shin Bet net of informers?
An individual Arab listens to the news, is incensed by
the latest outrage against the Holy Shrines and drives his car into the nearest
group of Israeli soldiers or civilians. Or takes a knife from the kitchen of
the Israeli restaurant where he washes the dishes and stabs people in the
street. No prior information. No network to be infiltrated. Quite frustrating.
The center of the storm is the Temple Mount. The
al-Aqsa (“far away”) Mosque, the third holiest place of Islam, is under siege.
At one point, Israeli soldiers entered the mosque (with their boots on) in
pursuit of stone-throwing demonstrators.
Where are we going?
For decades now, a group of Israeli zealots has been
busy planning for a new Jewish Temple to be built in place of the al-Aqsa and
the magnificent Dome of the Rock. They are stitching garments for priests and
making the necessary preparations for animal sacrifices.
Until recently, they were considered simply a
curiosity. Not anymore.
Several cabinet ministers and Knesset members have
entered the holy enclosure to pray, contrary to the status quo.
Throughout the Islamic world, this has aroused alarm. Palestinians in East
Jerusalem, the West Bank, the Gaza Strip and in Israel proper are furious.
Netanyahu promised King Abdallah II to restore quiet.
But he is doing the opposite.
Jesus turned water into wine. Netanyahu is turning
water into gasoline and pouring it on the flames.
URI AVNERY is an Israeli writer and peace
activist with Gush Shalom. He is a contributor to CounterPunch’s book The Politics of
Anti-Semitism.
No comments:
Post a Comment